<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is the numerical energy efficiency for wind energy, passive solar energy, and active solar energy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eblips.net/wind-solar-energy/what-is-the-numerical-energy-efficiency-for-wind-energy-passive-solar-energy-and-active-solar-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eblips.net/wind-solar-energy/what-is-the-numerical-energy-efficiency-for-wind-energy-passive-solar-energy-and-active-solar-energy/</link>
	<description>Helping Relieve Poverty Though The Provision of Solar Energy. Join Us!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 07:51:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.eblips.net/wind-solar-energy/what-is-the-numerical-energy-efficiency-for-wind-energy-passive-solar-energy-and-active-solar-energy/#comment-1649</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eblips.net/wind-solar-energy/what-is-the-numerical-energy-efficiency-for-wind-energy-passive-solar-energy-and-active-solar-energy#comment-1649</guid>
		<description>Wind power companies like to claim ~35% efficiency with their systems but the best recorded in operation is a maximum of 20% 
Solar panels are incredibly inefficient with efficiency ratings of less than 2% of energy emitted adsorbed into energy.
Ambient /Reflective solar energy systems believe it or not are more efficient around 10% in adsorbing energy but the turbines used to turn the energy into electricity are only around 20% efficient so the number is only 2%

The trick with solar is to use the energy collected by the reflectors for heating something to get the efficiency of the heat created. that&#039;s why they make good water heaters. 

By the way gas and diesel piston engines are only 20 to 30 % efficiency, Gas turbine engines are around 50% but if used as a co-gen unit where both the engine created energy and heat are utilized their efficiencies go into the 90% level.
It&#039;s part of the reason gas turbine power plants are so comon.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wind power companies like to claim ~35% efficiency with their systems but the best recorded in operation is a maximum of 20%<br />
Solar panels are incredibly inefficient with efficiency ratings of less than 2% of energy emitted adsorbed into energy.<br />
Ambient /Reflective solar energy systems believe it or not are more efficient around 10% in adsorbing energy but the turbines used to turn the energy into electricity are only around 20% efficient so the number is only 2%</p>
<p>The trick with solar is to use the energy collected by the reflectors for heating something to get the efficiency of the heat created. that&#8217;s why they make good water heaters. </p>
<p>By the way gas and diesel piston engines are only 20 to 30 % efficiency, Gas turbine engines are around 50% but if used as a co-gen unit where both the engine created energy and heat are utilized their efficiencies go into the 90% level.<br />
It&#8217;s part of the reason gas turbine power plants are so comon.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nata T</title>
		<link>http://www.eblips.net/wind-solar-energy/what-is-the-numerical-energy-efficiency-for-wind-energy-passive-solar-energy-and-active-solar-energy/#comment-1648</link>
		<dc:creator>Nata T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eblips.net/wind-solar-energy/what-is-the-numerical-energy-efficiency-for-wind-energy-passive-solar-energy-and-active-solar-energy#comment-1648</guid>
		<description>You need to define the efficency, as compared to what?

Wind turbines can only put out about 35% of their rated capacity, again based on location.  Some may achieve 40% while others located in areas with little wind may only make 5%.

Active and passive solar efficency is based on the number os watts that hit them that are saved.  I&#039;d guess passive might reach 40% and active 50%, depending on location.  On a daily average, including night, its about 8% and 10%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to define the efficency, as compared to what?</p>
<p>Wind turbines can only put out about 35% of their rated capacity, again based on location.  Some may achieve 40% while others located in areas with little wind may only make 5%.</p>
<p>Active and passive solar efficency is based on the number os watts that hit them that are saved.  I&#8217;d guess passive might reach 40% and active 50%, depending on location.  On a daily average, including night, its about 8% and 10%.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny P</title>
		<link>http://www.eblips.net/wind-solar-energy/what-is-the-numerical-energy-efficiency-for-wind-energy-passive-solar-energy-and-active-solar-energy/#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 06:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eblips.net/wind-solar-energy/what-is-the-numerical-energy-efficiency-for-wind-energy-passive-solar-energy-and-active-solar-energy#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>12, 6 and 9.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>12, 6 and 9.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

