Therefore when God IS proven to exist, God will cease to be just a theory too!
References :

1 you don’t have a science degree,
2 this is a joke.
References :

I noticed from your profile that you are a recent newcomer to "Yahoo Answers". Your question has been posed many times before. I will say that your logic is sound, but will be attacked harshly by those that are evolutionary diehards. You will be called stupid, ignorant or a moron. They will cite the ACLU’s website. This website goes as far as to tell people how to debate Creationists.

They will also bring in "every body knows" statements such as one answerer did when he talked about transitional fossils, and that there were many that have been discovered. Notice he gave no source. Another belittled you by asking if you were ignorant of "Nature". Now I will use an "everybody knows" statement. Everybody knows that "Nature" is a publication that has a strong evolutionary bias.

Others will either ignore or play down issues that do not support their point of view. I noticed that nobody explained how DNA, RNA, cell walls, amino acids, proteins and all the other things that are needed to maintain a cell all came together at one time and then lasted long enough to reproduce asexually. Tack on to this the whole process of sexual reproduction, and you have a huge hurdle for those that believe in evolution to overcome.

Another thing that you will find is that they will put you and I and anybody else that challenges them in the same category as those that they say are absolute idiots such as those that believe in a flat earth, (Richard Dawkin is famous for this technique.) and that the craters on the moon were made by Satan as he struggled against God. (The ACLU website indicates that a prominant Christian preacher said this.) As you would see if you examined the ACLU web site they set out the religious doctrine of atheism. (They call it Scientific.) And then tell their leaders and disciples how to win converts by undermining all other religious teachings.

Once you understand that evolution is an atheistic religion passing itself off as science you will have a better chance of going toe to toe with them in debate.

My daughter is a Chiropractor. Recently she indicated to me that those apes that are supposed to be closest to us genetically have a different number of vertebrae than humans. I recently looked at an article in the National Geographical Society. “Everybody knows” that they are extremely pro evolution. They indicated that they had found fossil remains of the oldest human baby at 3 million years. However most of its vertebrae were missing. In the same article they used fossils that had been shown to be fakes, as genuine finds. I find it interesting that another discovery of fossiled human remains are not mentioned in their article. The reason. These fossils, (Ten humans in all, five males, four females, and one child) were found in the same strata layer as the dinosaur graveyard in New Mexico. “Everybody knows” that dinosaurs went extinct about 100 million years ago. Humans have only been around for 3 million years. Therefore the find is fraudulent. That’s how evolution works. (See below for the source.)

Remember Libby, that the ACLU spends millions upon millions to advance their religion. I think that the main reason for this is that they are too proud to admit that there may be a God. (If there was a God, that God might require something from them.)

Here are some web sites that you will find interesting.

http://www.bible.ca/tracks/tracks.
This is the website of Geologist Don Patton. He has several evidences that humans and dinosaurs co-existed. Interesting.

Another is:
http://www.evolution-facts.com
This is a website that looks at hundreds of different difficulties with evolution.

A third is:
http://www.darwinismrefuted.com
This is a look at evolution from an Islamic point of view. (Christians are not the only ones that have problems with evolution.) I found this site both large and well thought out.

I hope this helps,

God bless

Bryan
References :

If science did not change it would become stagnant…like religion.
References :

I find this hard to believe, because if you did, you would recognize that the word "theory" is not an idea that hasn’t been proven. That would be a hypothesis.

A Theory is a hypothesis for which significant and verifiable evidence has been found.

A tested hypothesis, which has been repeated, or has a great body of evidence suporting it becomes a theory. A theory is a working model based on significant evidence and testing. "Atomic theory" is one such "theory" which is used today. It is a "theory" that if sufficient fissionable material is compressed into a small area, that it will explode. As this is simply a theory, would you dare to sit beside such a device as the counter goes down to zero?

It is a "theory" that polarizing filters at the correct angle will polarize light by aligning the polarity. It is a theory that liquid crystals will act as this sort of filter. This theory is used to create liquid crystal displays. If you’ve got an LCD monitory, you’re simply watching a "theory".

I have a science background as well. My last job was as an engineer developing test equipment for MEMS "micro-electro-mechanical systems". I worked with "theories" that are used to deploy airbags in automobiles. I worked with "laws" and "facts" as well. There is little difference between the three with the exception that "laws" have been proved for thousands of years. If the "law" of gravity had been found perhaps 50 years ago, it would still be called a "theory". The hypothesis came about when the apple fell from the tree. After many expirements, it was called a "law". You won’t hear of an "atomic law" as the word "theory" is its modern (almost) equivalent.

Your understanding of evolution is flawed as well. In saying we don’t see creatures evolving, you are missing the point. We are ALL evolving. No theory of evolution claims that humans came from monkeys, but that humans and monkeys had a common ancestor. And further back, humans and monkeys and dolphins, etc. all had a common ancestor.

Creatures existing now didn’t come from each other… they had common ancestors that were different than each.

If you have a degree in science and chemistry, please let me know what school so that I can keep my kids out of it.

This is getting ridiculous! No partly developed apendages or organs…?

Appendix.

Wings on flightless birds.

Vestigal feet in sea mammals.

Should I go on?
References :

I believe many animals have adapted to their environment and thus their features change to meet their surrounding needs…thus adaptation! However, to evolve into something totally more advance such as monkey into man would mean that the monkey would no longer exist because man would take his place…why does the monkey still exist????

The same can be said for apes and all other animals someone could possibly say man evolved from! Why do they all still exist today?"

– I find it hard to believe you possess a science degree, and if that is true, then you coming out with arguments like that makes me think that your university is a disgrace to the educational world.

It is not something that can be repeated in a lab environment.

In the real scientific community, of which I used to be a part, we are taught that all science has to be confirmable.

By confirmable, you must be able to set the experiment up in exactly the same way and get exactly the same result.

That cannot be done with evolution, so it has to be a theory.

Some people think that it is science if they say it is, and it cannot be disproved.
That is called a farce.

If a person sets up a conclusion upon unsubstantiated data, it is a hypothesis, not a fact.

grace2u
References :