Claudine Schneider, the winner of the EPA’s Global Climate Protection Award medal for 2007, sits on the National Board of Advisors for a NGO called The Carrying Capacity Network, an organisation which wants to section off large areas of America from people as wilderness before:[QUOTE]
""it’s developed, overrun, consumed, and polluted by runaway population growth. It’s not too late, and we hope that you will join us in this effort.""
Claudine Schnieder, who also sits on the board of trustees of American Solar Energy Society, the Climate Institute, TERI (led by IPCC head, Rajendra Pachuari), and the Center for Resource Solutions was the former member of the house of representatives from Rhode Island who in the early days of the climate change debate said:
"Scientists may disagree [about climate change] but we can hear mother earth and she is crying"
- She now sits on the board of the Union of Concerned Scientists.
Do you agree with Claudine Schneider that immigration must be effectively halted and population stabilised and then reduced to help prevent climate change and ensure we don’t exceed "carrying capacity"?
http://www.carryingcapacity.org/whatis.html
http://www.claudineschneider.com/
Well, it’s the 64 thousand dollar question.
I haven’t read those articles yet, but I will do.
The answer must lie with whether Climate Change is real or not, and if it is, whether man is adding to the problem.
If they’re real, then her point is valid, even if unpopular.
Even if you remove Climate Change from the equation, it still seems to me that we are overpopulating the planet. Again, if that’s also true, then it’s not just a question of immigration, it’s also a question of birth control. The more people on the planet, the more land is needed to sustain their needs, wherever they are.
Although the majority of the population explosion happens in underdeveloped countries, it’s people in the developed countries who place the most drain on world resources. Most of those are crammed into the cities, but we still require bio productive land to sustain our needs.
Take the population figures for the UK: http://puttheworldright.com/climate_change.html#ukpf
From the air it might look like we have plenty of space, but the figures say otherwise. It’s claimed if we never imported our requirements from elsewhere in the world, we would only have enough food for about three days.
Technology may reduce the problems to some extent, but the planet’s resources are still finite.